LABOUR AND BREXIT
LABOUR AND BREXIT
It’s
difficult to know which of Labour’s three main problems, Corbyn, policy blow
out or Brexit were most ruinous. All were wrong but intertwined into the
disaster.. Corbyn was bullied into a baffling Remain strategy he didn’t believe
in .The bonanza of promises was a
pathetic attempt to buy back Brexit voters. We offered negativism and gloom
against Boris’s boundless optimism.
But Brexit was the most important . It widened
the gulf between a party of metropolitan trendies and its regional class base. I always thought
that the job of the Labour Party was to lift up the workers not lecture them
and it doesn’t help to tell the people that they’re racist, stupid and
un-educated in voting Brexit.Yet defeat can tech lessons, leaders can be
changed and policy revised. So Labour’s main problem now is
Brexit. It’s going to happen,
however much Labour dislikes it. So having blundered into our naive folly on
this issue, the crucial question is what are we going to do about it?
Sadly
our political Bourbons seem to have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.Some
still preach listening to the people when we manifestly didn’t.Benn and the
Blairites still believe they were right to have held up the nation’s wishes for
so long. Second referendum addicts won’t admit that the election was it, and
it’s gone against them.The failed trick of opposing a hypothetical “no deal” to
make any deal impossible is already reviving and will become hysterical as
Boris’s takes on his Sisyphean task of
getting an acceptable settlement from a stultifying EU .On the other side of
the argument more Labour MPs have now grown the guts to vote for Boris’s bill
as the party, as a whole should have done for Theresa’s.
The
consolation is that Remainer warnings of death and hell fire haven’t happened
and having failed in their efforts to delay their influence in encouraging EU
obstinacy will be weaker in Brussels and actively resented in Britain. The
strength of national feeling has been demonstrated. The people have voted to
get it done. It’s time to stop standing in their way.So the real problem is not a revival of internal clan warfare but
the attitudes of the leadership contenders.
Two
candidates have already declared themselves pro Remain. Two others look like
Corbyn continuity candidates. Blairites have been damaged by self harm but
others will try and pander to the assumed pro-European instincts of party
members and Momentum. The real need is for a candidate of stature, but they’re
few on the ground today. So Labour needs to
settle on one who’s not strenuously committed on either side of an EU
argument which is, after all, secondary to the party’s purposes. Such a
candidate can do a Harold Wilson job and pull the Party together.
So
what do we do? Common sense has never played much part in Labour’s arcane
policy processes but now it suggests
going quiet on Brexit .Let Boris fulfill his mandate, back him when he
runs against EU intransigence and stop affronting the national feeling demonstrated by the
election. Protesting against a hypothetical “crash out” is really a cover for
objecting to any form of Brexit and now dead in the water. The people have
spoken. Boris has a majority. The time for stopping him, obstructing his
efforts and hoping he’ll fail has passed.
It
will change only if Boris gets a bad deal and begins to bluster and
betray.Britain has voted to give him his chance
and he’s no longer vulnerable on Brexit. But but he is if he fails to
live up to his wider promises of a new deal, one Nation toryism, ending
austerity, boosting the North and building a better, fairer society to go back
to the old gradgrind Toryism of cuts for the poor, bungs to the wealthy and
pathetic half measures. Then he becomes not just vulnerable to a full scale
Labour attack but he’s failed and our volatile electorate will punish him for
letting them down, as it punished Labour for the same reason this time.Until
that happens shut up on Brexit.
I don't see how the election represented a de facto second referendum vote in favour of Brexit when less than half the votes cast were for pro-leave parties. How can you characterise it as such?
ReplyDelete